What Is "ET Technology?"

I propose the question in the title as a stimulus to your thinking and mine.

What is “ET technology?”

The most obvious and direct answer is a combination of definitions of the word “ET” and “technology.” Let’s refer to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, online edition.

ET is an acronym for extraterrestrial, which means: (adjective) originating, existing, or occurring outside the earth or its atmosphere; (noun) a being from another world: an extraterrestrial being. I will suggest a refinement: “a being of extraterrestrial origin.”

Technology (is a noun that) means, the practical application of knowledge especially in a particular area.

So, mostly simply, ET technology means, practical application of knowledge by extraterrestrials. Great, I can stop with that. But of course, that would make for a rather prosaic and possibly boring post, and it doesn’t address what I had in mind.

Two questions immediately suggest themselves:

1) What are obvious implications of that definition? Well, first, are we talking about real or imaginary ETs? I suggest we confine ourselves to discussing real ones. And who would that be, more precisely? Well, there are apparently dozens of species visiting Earth, Alex Collier mentioned that there were “more than 170” in 1994 (in the interview to which I recently listened).

Who or which are the benevolent ETs currently interacting with humans on a significant scale? Pleiadians and Andromedans) two Galactic human species who have been interested in helping us liberate ourselves and them to ascend (which is a phenomenon that takes place in the consciousness of an individual or a species) to 4th and then 5th Densities.

We have also had extensive interaction with the Ciakahrr Reptilians and the Nebu Grays, which were not accompanied by benevolent intent on the part of those species, but we did get some technological advancement out of terrahu engagement with them. Even further back, the Anakhim or Annunaki were a very significant influence. And there have been others, and we can refer to external sources for more information about them….

ET technology would include whatever advanced tools visiting ETs have used in their interactions with our species and planetary environment.

2) What are other reasonable meanings of the term?

Whatever technology has been in development and usage outside of the public eye, by the “breakaway civilization” as ufologist Richard Dolan has dubbed it, that was acquired via successful reverse-engineering of alien “gifts,” arguably qualifies. The type and degree of ET influence in the development of advanced technology that has been, is, and will be used by our species is, I’m sure, quite variable.

I heard a story in the context of one of Dr. Michael Salla’s interviews; I forget with whom the interview was conducted and what the context was, but the story went something like this: Once upon a time (a few decades ago), three Pleiadian women were employed as administrative assistants at a well-known laboratory involved in development of advanced technology. The women were invited to attend meetings in which the scientists working at the lab would brainstorm and discuss theoretical and practical problems they were facing in connection with their work. The three women (who were known to be ETs by some, and suspected of having that origin by others) would very frequently make insightful suggestions that would greatly facilitate the work of the scientists (who were mostly or entirely of the male gender), without their asking for or accepting any credit. But the three Pleiadian female assistants were a very valued part of the overall team, and pulled more than their share of the technology development load.

So, with those points in mind, I think that beyond reasonable doubt we are using “ET technology” every day. What devices incorporate “ET tech” in this sense? Electronics of all kinds, certainly, but also some relatively mundane things. For example, a few years ago I owned a pair of spectacles, the frames of which were made of “memory metal” and could be practically tied in knots, but when released would spring back to their original configuration with total precision. In one way, those frames were a “fun” novelty and conversation piece, but they were also very practical.

I think that more and more obviously, we are going to see ET technology incorporated into healing tech of various kinds. This has already occurred to a significant extent, although I decline to here explore examples, with one exception—and what I’m about to share involves mere personal opinions or speculations, which I will try to explain.

At 3am today, I joined a webinar that is part of a “3-day challenge” that has two essential features: 1) it’s a giveaway of free information introducing participants to a particular, highly effective healing technology—in the sense that hypnotherapy is a technology and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is a technology. (Terms like “techniques” or “approaches” are used more frequently than “technology,” but aren’t such practices “applications of knowledge?” I think that is clearly the case, hence they qualify as technologies.) 2) The “challenge” serves to entangle the participant with the information, techniques, and processes being taught, engendering a desire to learn more and master practical use of the technology, the means toward that end being a high-ticket coaching program and/or practitioner training. I am not interested in immediately engaging beyond the three-day challenge at this time, but I won’t rule out the possibility of doing so in the future. In case you’d care to learn more, the technology is dubbed Belief Coding, and it was developed by Jess Cunningham, who resides in the UK.

So that the previous paragraph doesn’t just stand out in a“sore thumb” manner and role, I will expose how it integrates into my theme here.

I am not suggesting that Jess Cunningham is an ET (although she might be). I am also not suggesting that she was visited by ETs, who taught her some of what she knows—the most essential parts, perhaps (although that also could be true).

Jess has a notable penchant for starburst patterned jewelry, just saying. (Note as an example her earrings in the above video).

… Nevertheless, I had the thought, while listening to Jess expound and coming to grips with the evident—meaning, supported by evidence—near-panacea nature of the Belief Coding process, that “this is ET technology,” meaning that it is so advanced that its efficacy and efficiency seem almost magical, and would especially seem so to people who have spent a lot of time, money and effort working with more traditional healing technologies. I am not bashing other approaches, but when certain willing subjects of a process aver that one 45-minute session resulted in complete release of a chronic condition that all other approaches had failed to remediate despite long years of coping with the problem and trying “everything” to overcome it, clearly the leap of advancement embodied by the technology is remarkable.

Jess’ own explanation of how she developed Belief Coding has several essential features, including her own journey of dysfunction, discouraging life problems, dismaying life events, trauma and emotional pain; her resulting obsession with finding a way to heal, and studying every technique regarding which she could access information, which led to some very positive results; and then breakthrough insights and the development of an original approach based on those insights along with all her prior learning—the last step, probably very importantly, undertaken by her with the guidance and encouragement of her spirit guides.

Did you know that some people’s spirit guides are ETs? (But I am not saying that’s so in Jess’ case, either.)

I think the notion that Belief Coding is “ET technology” was probably served up by my “thinker” as a metaphor, but it could be one that incorporates a measure of truth and/or a kind of truth.

Alex Collier said in 1994 that everyone here on Earth “is an ET” in that our souls incarnated on other planets before they began incarnating here. Considering that the Earth became a world hospitable to life, and particularly human life, a finite number of years / centuries / millennia etc. in the past, and many souls could be far older, Alex’s point makes sense in a way that takes nothing away from the envoy or “starseed” program in which many advanced, high-frequency souls (or ISBEs if one prefers that term) have specifically chosen to incarnate here to help with the liberation and ascension of our species.

Here is one starseed’s very brief / very encouraging comment on the envoy program:

https://youtube.com/shorts/co41_mqj_MA

Despite speculation and claims about NPCs and AI-activated clones allegedly occupying space in our common reality, Elena Danaan has provided assurance that everyone now living on earth is an ensouled being. And each of us has, as elements of our genetic coding, contributions by as many as 22 different “star peoples,” including, but never limited to, whatever indigenous hominid species the Seeders began working with a very long time ago. The indigenous DNA binds us to our planetary Mother, a conscious living entity known as Gaia and by many other names; and we are bound to the Universe beyond our planet via all the other contributions to the essence of the biological ET technology that hosts the soul or ISBE.

So, if we ourselves are in a very real sense ET technology, then every application of knowledge that we produce is also in a sense ET technology—much as Buckminster Fuller proposed that man is a product of Nature (Gaia), hence all of Man’s creations are also (indirectly) products of Nature. That proposition turns out to refer to a coin that, by its very nature, has two sides (or arguably, 22 sides).